# Thursday, January 27, 2005
posted on Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:41:30 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #   

For anyone who wants to take the pulse of the UK .NET bloggers, James Crowley who runs the Developer Fusion site, has put together a page of aggregated UK Developer blogs, with an RSS feed as well.

posted on Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:19:59 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #   

Ian Cooper gave a presentation last night's London .NET User Group on Data Mapping Patterns in .NET.  He explained many of the patterns from Martin Fowler's book Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture.  He started with the basic Transaction Script pattern through to the Table Model and finally the Domain Model.  Along the way he demoed the Data Access Application Block (which to my surprise, only half the audience admitted knowing about).

 

I enjoyed seeing many of these patterns shown in action using nHibernate.  I haven't looked at the ORM frameworks for a while and was pleased to see how far things have developed.  Ian recommended the book 'Hibernate in Aciton' by Christian Bauer and Gavin King as a good introduction.  You can read a sample chapter and a book review on theserverside.com.

 

Ian's main point was that you should look to use nHibernate or another existing ORM tool rather than writing your own (avoid the ORM Vietnam issue that Ted Neward mentions), but to be careful not to see ORM tools as a hammer that makes all problems look nails.

 

Graham Parker, the retiring VBUG Chairman, was on before Ian talking about Java and .NET Interoperability.  I missed the start of the session but there was lot of good discussion from the attendees.  A large number of people  were aware of the Mono project and it's recent developments such as support for ASP.NET, Windows.Forms and ADO.NET.  There was also discussion about how Source Forge Source Gear are using Mono for their Vault commercial product.

 

Max Kington chipped in from the floor with a number of good insights based on his experience with Java.  I had a good chat with him afterwards on a range of topics from grid computing, web services to his claim that '2005 is the year of the domain specific language'.

 

All up another good LDNUG event.  Ingo Rammer is going to speak at the next event on Wednesday 23 February!

posted on Thursday, January 27, 2005 10:11:27 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #   
# Saturday, January 08, 2005

Hats off to Christian Weyer for creating his WSCF 'Web Services Contract First' tool to help provide Visual Studio tool support for building web services by starting with the XML schema and then generating the code.

The key to creating interoperable web services is to ‘build from the centre out’ and start by designing the messages that will be exchanged on the wire (the contract) and then work back to the implementation model that is used at the sender and receiver.  There are two basic approaches to building web services 'contract first' in .NET: code-based or schema-based.  The first approach is to start with the code and add Webmethod and XML Serialization attributes and allow .NET to generate the 'contract' (the WSDL file).  The second apporach involves XML Schema first and using this to create the WSDL file and generate the code, which happens to be Simon Guest’s number 1 recommendation for building interoperable web services.  Visual Studio has good support for the code-based approach to web service design, but up to now hasn't provided much support for the XML Schema approach.  This is where Christian’s WSCF tool comes in.

The tool performs two key tasks.  Firstly, the WSCF tool allows you to create the WSDL file from an XML Schema that describes the web services message.  Secondly, the WSCF tool can generate the code for the client- and server-side web services proxy classes that can be called from your .NET code.

Christian has a useful walk-through that illustrates how the WSCF tool can work.  The steps include:

  • Using the Visual Studio XML Editor to create a schema for the data or entities that will be used in the web services messages.
  • Creating a second schema that models the messages that will be sent and received by the web service.  This is done by imports the first schema file (using xs:import).  I liked keeping these two schemas separated using this technique.
  • Using the WSCF tool to take this second schema and match up the web service operations with the messages to create the WSDL file.  I like that this step highlights the availability of Request/Response and One-Way message exchange patterns.
  • Using the WSCF tool to create client- and server-side proxies from this WSDL file (including supporting public properties, serializable classes and collections).

As well as being a VS plug in the tool can also be run from the command line, making it easy to run as part of build process for instance.

While not everyone will want to design web services starting from the XML Schema, for those that do this tool will be a useful timesaver.  It also helps drive home the concept that web services are about messages and not objects.

Christian spoke about this tool and the general ‘contract first’ approach at a recent INETA-sponsored presentation at IrishDev.  You download the slides as well as reading good summaries from Marcus Mac Innes Contract First, Guinness Second as well as Keiran Lyman with Contractual Obligations (or, 'First Contact with Contracts').

posted on Saturday, January 08, 2005 9:03:23 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #   
# Thursday, January 06, 2005

Via Rob Caron’s awesome list of Visual Studio Team System resources I came across Sam Guckenheimer’s presentation about Designing for User Experience in Visual Studio Team Systems which had the following gem. 

Apparently the VSTS design team visited a major bank where a bunch of managers assured them that unit testing was a standard team practice.  However, after doing a 4 hour contextual interview with a developer the interviewer asked how they did unit testing to which the developer replied:

Haven’t you seen me? I’ve been doing it all along – every time I press F5 that’s unit testing.

Brilliant!  This beats the time when I was assured that a team were ‘100% into Unit Testing’ only to find that all of the NUnit tests were set to Ignore.

posted on Thursday, January 06, 2005 9:10:00 PM (GMT Standard Time, UTC+00:00)  #